
Navigating the Algorithmic Tightrope Small Business Ethics in Automated Management
Consider a local bakery, once managed by handshakes and intuition, now contemplating software to schedule staff and predict demand. This isn’t science fiction; it’s the reality facing countless Small and Medium Businesses Meaning ● Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) represent enterprises with workforces and revenues below certain thresholds, varying by country and industry sector; within the context of SMB growth, these organizations are actively strategizing for expansion and scalability. (SMBs) as algorithmic management systems Meaning ● Algorithmic Management Systems are tech-driven frameworks using algorithms to automate and optimize SMB management for efficiency and data-driven decisions. (AMS) become increasingly accessible. These systems, powered by data and code, promise efficiency and optimization, yet they also introduce a new layer of complexity, particularly in the realm of business ethics. Ignoring the ethical dimensions of AMS is akin to navigating a busy intersection blindfolded ● the immediate dangers might be missed, and the long-term consequences can be devastating.

The Allure of Automation Efficiency and the Ethical Oversight
SMBs often operate on tight margins, constantly seeking ways to streamline operations and boost productivity. AMS present themselves as a solution, offering tools to automate tasks ranging from employee scheduling and performance monitoring Meaning ● Performance Monitoring, in the sphere of SMBs, signifies the systematic tracking and analysis of key performance indicators (KPIs) to gauge the effectiveness of business processes, automation initiatives, and overall strategic implementation. to customer service Meaning ● Customer service, within the context of SMB growth, involves providing assistance and support to customers before, during, and after a purchase, a vital function for business survival. and marketing. The appeal is undeniable ● reduced labor costs, data-driven decision-making, and the promise of a more efficient, profitable business. However, this focus on efficiency can overshadow a critical element ● the ethical implications embedded within these very algorithms.
Algorithms are not neutral; they are created by humans, reflecting human biases and priorities. When these biases are baked into management systems, they can perpetuate unfair practices, erode employee trust, and ultimately damage the very fabric of an SMB.
Ignoring the ethical dimensions of algorithmic management Meaning ● Algorithmic management, within the domain of Small and Medium-sized Businesses, refers to the use of algorithms and data analytics to automate and optimize decision-making processes related to workforce management and business operations. is a strategic oversight that SMBs cannot afford.

Beyond the Bottom Line Human Impact of Algorithmic Decisions
For an SMB, employees are not just resources; they are the lifeblood of the business. They are the faces customers recognize, the voices on the phone, and the hands that craft the products or services offered. AMS, in their pursuit of optimization, can sometimes reduce employees to data points, overlooking their individual needs, aspirations, and circumstances. Imagine an algorithm that penalizes employees for taking sick days based on historical data, without considering legitimate health concerns or unforeseen circumstances.
Such a system, while perhaps efficient in a narrow sense, can breed resentment, decrease morale, and lead to higher employee turnover. Ethical considerations demand a more holistic approach, one that balances efficiency with fairness and respects the human element in every business decision.

Trust and Transparency Cornerstones of SMB Ethical Practice
SMBs often thrive on personal relationships ● with customers, suppliers, and employees. Trust is paramount. Introducing AMS without considering ethical implications can erode this trust. If employees perceive algorithmic systems as opaque, unfair, or punitive, they are likely to become disengaged and distrustful of management.
Similarly, if customers feel that their interactions are being manipulated or unfairly influenced by algorithms, their loyalty can wane. Transparency is key to mitigating these risks. SMBs need to be open with their employees and customers about how AMS are being used, what data is being collected, and how decisions are being made. This transparency builds confidence and demonstrates a commitment to ethical practices, reinforcing the trust that is so vital for SMB success.

Practical Steps for Ethical Algorithmic Implementation
Considering ethical implications does not have to be a daunting or expensive undertaking for SMBs. It starts with awareness and a willingness to ask critical questions. Before implementing any AMS, SMB owners should consider the potential ethical ramifications. What data will be collected?
How will this data be used? Could the system inadvertently discriminate against certain groups of employees or customers? Are there mechanisms in place to ensure fairness and transparency? Engaging employees in the decision-making process, seeking feedback, and being prepared to adjust systems based on ethical considerations are all practical steps that SMBs can take. Ethical implementation is not about abandoning automation; it is about harnessing its power responsibly and in a way that aligns with the values and long-term sustainability Meaning ● Long-Term Sustainability, in the realm of SMB growth, automation, and implementation, signifies the ability of a business to maintain its operations, profitability, and positive impact over an extended period. of the business.

Checklist for Ethical AMS Consideration
Before adopting an Algorithmic Management System, SMBs should consider these questions:
- Data Privacy ● What employee or customer data will the system collect, and how will it be protected?
- Bias Detection ● Has the algorithm been tested for potential biases that could unfairly disadvantage certain groups?
- Transparency ● How transparent will the system be to employees and customers regarding its decision-making processes?
- Fairness and Equity ● Does the system promote fair and equitable treatment for all stakeholders?
- Human Oversight ● Are there mechanisms for human oversight and intervention in algorithmic decisions?
- Employee Input ● Have employees been consulted about the implementation and impact of the AMS?
- Accountability ● Who is accountable for the ethical performance of the AMS?
- Regular Review ● Will the system be regularly reviewed and updated to address ethical concerns and evolving standards?

Common Algorithmic Management Systems in SMBs
System Type Employee Scheduling Software |
Function Automates shift scheduling based on predicted demand and employee availability. |
Potential Ethical Concerns Unfair shift assignments, lack of flexibility for employees, algorithmic bias in predicting demand leading to understaffing. |
System Type Performance Monitoring Tools |
Function Tracks employee productivity metrics, such as keystrokes, call times, or sales figures. |
Potential Ethical Concerns Privacy violations, stress and pressure on employees, narrow focus on quantifiable metrics neglecting qualitative contributions. |
System Type Customer Relationship Management (CRM) Systems |
Function Analyzes customer data to personalize marketing and sales efforts. |
Potential Ethical Concerns Data privacy concerns, manipulative marketing tactics, algorithmic bias in customer segmentation leading to discriminatory pricing or service. |
System Type Recruitment and Hiring Platforms |
Function Uses algorithms to screen resumes and assess candidates. |
Potential Ethical Concerns Algorithmic bias in candidate selection, lack of transparency in the hiring process, potential for discrimination based on protected characteristics. |
Ignoring ethics in the rush to automate is a short-sighted strategy. The true measure of business success extends beyond immediate profits; it encompasses long-term sustainability, employee well-being, and customer loyalty. Ethical algorithmic management Meaning ● Ethical Algorithmic Management for SMBs ensures fair, transparent, and accountable use of algorithms, fostering trust and sustainable growth. is not an obstacle to efficiency; it is a pathway to building a stronger, more resilient, and ultimately more successful SMB in the long run.

Strategic Integration of Ethics Algorithmic Management as a Competitive Advantage
The initial embrace of algorithmic management systems (AMS) by Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) often centers on the promise of operational efficiency. However, a more sophisticated understanding reveals that ethical considerations are not merely a compliance checkbox; they are a strategic lever capable of driving competitive advantage Meaning ● SMB Competitive Advantage: Ecosystem-embedded, hyper-personalized value, sustained by strategic automation, ensuring resilience & impact. and long-term value creation. In an increasingly transparent and socially conscious marketplace, SMBs that proactively address the ethical implications of AMS are positioning themselves for sustained growth and resilience.

Ethical Algorithmic Management Beyond Compliance to Competitive Edge
Many SMBs initially view ethical considerations through a compliance lens, focusing on adhering to legal requirements and avoiding penalties. While compliance is essential, it represents a baseline. Ethical algorithmic management, when strategically integrated, transcends mere compliance. It becomes a differentiator, attracting and retaining talent, building stronger customer relationships, and enhancing brand reputation.
Consider two competing SMBs in the same industry. One implements AMS solely for efficiency, overlooking ethical implications, potentially leading to employee dissatisfaction and customer distrust. The other SMB, however, invests in ethical design and implementation, fostering a culture of fairness and transparency. This ethical commitment can become a significant competitive advantage, attracting ethically conscious customers and employees who value responsible business practices.
Ethical algorithmic management is not a cost center; it is an investment in long-term competitive advantage and sustainable growth.

Navigating the Ethical Minefield Specific Challenges for SMBs
SMBs face unique ethical challenges in the context of AMS. Compared to larger corporations, they often have fewer resources dedicated to ethical oversight and risk management. They may lack in-house expertise in data ethics, algorithmic bias Meaning ● Algorithmic bias in SMBs: unfair outcomes from automated systems due to flawed data or design. detection, or regulatory compliance. Furthermore, the close-knit nature of many SMBs can amplify the impact of ethical missteps.
A perceived algorithmic injustice, even if unintentional, can quickly spread through word-of-mouth, damaging employee morale and community reputation. SMBs must therefore adopt a pragmatic and proactive approach to ethical AMS implementation, focusing on practical steps and leveraging available resources to mitigate risks and build ethical safeguards.

Frameworks for Ethical Algorithmic Design and Implementation
To move beyond reactive compliance and embrace ethical AMS as a strategic asset, SMBs can adopt structured frameworks for ethical design and implementation. These frameworks provide a systematic approach to identifying, assessing, and mitigating ethical risks throughout the AMS lifecycle ● from design and development to deployment and monitoring. One such framework is the “Ethics by Design” approach, which emphasizes embedding ethical considerations into the very architecture of the system. This involves proactively identifying potential ethical dilemmas, incorporating fairness and transparency principles into algorithmic design, and establishing mechanisms for ongoing ethical review and adaptation.
Another valuable framework is the “Algorithmic Impact Assessment,” a process for systematically evaluating the potential social and ethical consequences of an AMS before deployment. By utilizing these frameworks, SMBs can move from ad-hoc ethical considerations to a more structured and strategic approach.

Case Studies Ethical Wins and Algorithmic Pitfalls in SMBs
Examining real-world examples of SMBs navigating the ethical landscape of AMS provides valuable insights. Consider a small e-commerce business that implemented an AI-powered customer service chatbot. Initially, the chatbot improved response times and reduced customer service costs. However, customers began to complain about the chatbot’s inability to handle complex issues and its impersonal nature.
The SMB realized that while the algorithm was efficient, it was eroding customer satisfaction and damaging the personal touch that had been a hallmark of their brand. They responded by retraining the chatbot to handle a wider range of queries, incorporating more human-like language, and ensuring seamless escalation to human agents when necessary. This ethical adjustment not only improved customer satisfaction but also reinforced their brand value of personalized service. Conversely, consider an SMB that used an algorithm to monitor employee email communications.
While intended to detect security threats, the system was perceived as intrusive and violated employee privacy. This led to significant employee backlash, decreased trust, and ultimately, the system was abandoned. These case studies underscore the importance of proactively considering ethical implications and adapting AMS implementation to align with business values and stakeholder expectations.

Ethical Frameworks for Algorithmic Management
- Ethics by Design ● Integrating ethical considerations into the design and development process of AMS.
- Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) ● Systematically evaluating the potential ethical and social impacts of AMS before deployment.
- Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency (FAT) Principles ● Guiding principles for ethical AI and algorithmic systems, emphasizing fairness, accountability, and transparency.
- Value-Sensitive Design (VSD) ● A design approach that explicitly considers human values throughout the technology design process.
- OECD Principles on AI ● International guidelines promoting responsible and trustworthy AI, including ethical considerations.

Ethical Risk Assessment Matrix for SMB Algorithmic Management
Risk Category Algorithmic Bias |
Potential Impact on SMB Discriminatory outcomes, unfair treatment of employees or customers, legal liabilities, reputational damage. |
Mitigation Strategies Bias detection and mitigation techniques, diverse datasets, regular algorithm audits, human oversight. |
Severity (Low, Medium, High) High |
Risk Category Data Privacy Violations |
Potential Impact on SMB Legal penalties, loss of customer trust, reputational damage, financial losses. |
Mitigation Strategies Robust data security measures, data minimization, anonymization techniques, compliance with data privacy regulations (e.g., GDPR, CCPA). |
Severity (Low, Medium, High) High |
Risk Category Lack of Transparency |
Potential Impact on SMB Employee distrust, customer dissatisfaction, difficulty in identifying and addressing errors, reputational damage. |
Mitigation Strategies Explainable AI (XAI) techniques, clear communication about AMS usage, accessible appeals processes, human-in-the-loop systems. |
Severity (Low, Medium, High) Medium |
Risk Category Erosion of Human Agency |
Potential Impact on SMB Employee demotivation, deskilling, reduced creativity and innovation, negative impact on organizational culture. |
Mitigation Strategies Focus on human-machine collaboration, empowering employees with AMS tools, preserving human decision-making in critical areas, investing in employee training and development. |
Severity (Low, Medium, High) Medium |
Risk Category Accountability Gaps |
Potential Impact on SMB Difficulty in assigning responsibility for algorithmic errors or harms, legal and ethical ambiguities, reputational damage. |
Mitigation Strategies Clearly defined roles and responsibilities for AMS oversight, robust audit trails, mechanisms for redress and remediation, ethical review boards. |
Severity (Low, Medium, High) Medium |
The strategic integration of ethics into algorithmic management is not merely about avoiding negative consequences; it is about actively building a more responsible, resilient, and competitive SMB. By embracing ethical design principles, adopting proactive risk assessment frameworks, and fostering a culture of transparency and fairness, SMBs can unlock the full potential of AMS while simultaneously strengthening their brand, building trust, and securing long-term success in an increasingly algorithm-driven world.

Algorithmic Governance and the Future of SMBs Navigating Ethical Complexity in Automated Ecosystems
The adoption of algorithmic management systems (AMS) by Small and Medium Businesses (SMBs) marks a significant shift beyond mere operational automation; it represents a fundamental transformation in organizational governance and decision-making paradigms. As SMBs increasingly integrate AMS into core business functions, ethical considerations transcend individual system design and implementation, demanding a holistic approach to algorithmic governance. This necessitates a strategic reframing of business ethics, moving from reactive risk mitigation Meaning ● Within the dynamic landscape of SMB growth, automation, and implementation, Risk Mitigation denotes the proactive business processes designed to identify, assess, and strategically reduce potential threats to organizational goals. to proactive value creation within complex, algorithmically mediated ecosystems.

From Ethical Implementation to Algorithmic Governance A Systemic Perspective
The initial focus on ethical AMS implementation often centers on individual algorithms and their immediate impacts. However, as SMBs deploy multiple interconnected AMS across various business functions, ethical challenges become systemic and emergent. Consider an SMB utilizing AMS for customer relationship management, employee performance monitoring, and supply chain optimization. The ethical implications are no longer isolated to each system but rather arise from the interactions and interdependencies between these systems.
For example, data collected by the CRM system might be used to inform employee performance evaluations, potentially creating feedback loops that reinforce biases or exacerbate inequalities. Algorithmic governance Meaning ● Automated rule-based systems guiding SMB operations for efficiency and data-driven decisions. addresses these systemic ethical risks by establishing overarching principles, policies, and processes to guide the development, deployment, and monitoring of all AMS within the organization. It moves beyond a piecemeal approach to ethical considerations, embracing a holistic and strategic perspective on algorithmic responsibility.
Algorithmic governance is not about controlling algorithms; it is about shaping the organizational ecosystem in which algorithms operate to ensure ethical and value-driven outcomes.

The Ethical Debt of Automation Unintended Consequences and Long-Term Liabilities
The pursuit of efficiency through automation can inadvertently create an “ethical debt” ● a accumulation of unresolved ethical issues that, if left unaddressed, can become significant liabilities in the long term. This ethical debt can manifest in various forms, including eroded employee trust, customer alienation, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny. For SMBs, the ethical debt of automation can be particularly precarious, as they often lack the resources and resilience to weather ethical crises compared to larger corporations.
Ignoring the ethical implications of AMS in the short term might yield immediate gains in efficiency, but it can accumulate into a substantial ethical debt that undermines long-term sustainability and value creation. Proactive algorithmic governance is essential to managing and mitigating this ethical debt, ensuring that automation efforts contribute to long-term ethical and business value.

Stakeholder Engagement and Algorithmic Accountability in SMB Ecosystems
Ethical algorithmic governance in SMBs requires active engagement with diverse stakeholders, including employees, customers, suppliers, and the broader community. Stakeholder engagement Meaning ● Stakeholder engagement is the continuous process of building relationships with interested parties to co-create value and ensure SMB success. is crucial for understanding the ethical implications of AMS from multiple perspectives, identifying potential harms, and building trust and legitimacy. Furthermore, algorithmic accountability Meaning ● Taking responsibility for algorithm-driven outcomes in SMBs, ensuring fairness, transparency, and ethical practices. is paramount. This involves establishing clear lines of responsibility for algorithmic decisions, implementing mechanisms for redress and remediation when algorithmic harms occur, and ensuring transparency and explainability in algorithmic processes.
For SMBs, algorithmic accountability may require adapting existing governance structures or creating new roles and responsibilities to oversee ethical AMS implementation and operation. Engaging stakeholders and establishing robust accountability mechanisms are essential components of responsible algorithmic governance in SMB ecosystems.

Navigating the Evolving Regulatory Landscape and Ethical Standards
The regulatory landscape Meaning ● The Regulatory Landscape, in the context of SMB Growth, Automation, and Implementation, refers to the comprehensive ecosystem of laws, rules, guidelines, and policies that govern business operations within a specific jurisdiction or industry, impacting strategic decisions, resource allocation, and operational efficiency. surrounding algorithmic management and artificial intelligence is rapidly evolving. Regulations such as the EU AI Act and emerging data privacy Meaning ● Data privacy for SMBs is the responsible handling of personal data to build trust and enable sustainable business growth. laws are increasingly focusing on ethical considerations in algorithmic systems. SMBs must proactively navigate this evolving regulatory landscape to ensure compliance and mitigate legal risks. Beyond legal compliance, ethical standards and best practices for algorithmic management are also emerging from industry consortia, academic research, and civil society organizations.
Adopting these ethical standards can not only enhance regulatory compliance but also strengthen brand reputation Meaning ● Brand reputation, for a Small or Medium-sized Business (SMB), represents the aggregate perception stakeholders hold regarding its reliability, quality, and values. and build stakeholder trust. Algorithmic governance frameworks Meaning ● Algorithmic Governance Frameworks, within the SMB landscape, are structured guidelines and policies designed to manage the development, deployment, and application of algorithms, particularly those driving automation and impacting growth trajectories. should incorporate mechanisms for monitoring regulatory developments and ethical standards, adapting policies and practices to remain compliant and ethically responsible in a dynamic environment.

The Future of SMBs Ethical Innovation and Algorithmic Value Creation
Algorithmic governance is not merely about risk mitigation and compliance; it is also a catalyst for ethical innovation Meaning ● Ethical Innovation for SMBs: Integrating responsible practices into business for sustainable growth and positive impact. and algorithmic value creation. By proactively addressing ethical considerations, SMBs can unlock new opportunities for innovation and differentiation. For example, developing algorithms that promote fairness, transparency, and inclusivity can create unique value propositions for customers and employees. Ethical innovation in algorithmic management can also enhance brand reputation, attract ethically conscious investors, and foster a more positive and sustainable business ecosystem.
The future of SMBs Meaning ● The Future of SMBs is about proactive adaptation, leveraging tech and collaboration to thrive in a dynamic, ethical, and globally interconnected world. in an algorithmically driven world hinges on their ability to embrace ethical governance as a strategic imperative, transforming ethical considerations from a cost center to a source of competitive advantage and long-term value creation. SMBs that lead in ethical algorithmic governance Meaning ● Ethical Algorithmic Governance, within the realm of small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs), concerns the frameworks and processes established to ensure fairness, transparency, and accountability in the deployment of algorithms for automation and growth initiatives. will be best positioned to thrive in the evolving landscape of automated ecosystems, building trust, fostering innovation, and securing sustainable success.

Key Components of Algorithmic Governance for SMBs
- Ethical Principles and Policies ● Establishing clear ethical principles and policies to guide AMS development and deployment.
- Algorithmic Impact Assessment (AIA) Framework ● Implementing a systematic process for evaluating the ethical and social impacts of AMS.
- Stakeholder Engagement Mechanisms ● Establishing channels for ongoing dialogue and feedback with employees, customers, and other stakeholders.
- Algorithmic Accountability Framework ● Defining roles, responsibilities, and processes for ensuring accountability for algorithmic decisions.
- Transparency and Explainability Measures ● Implementing techniques and practices to enhance the transparency and explainability of AMS.
- Ethical Review and Audit Processes ● Establishing mechanisms for regular ethical review and audit of AMS performance and impact.
- Continuous Monitoring and Adaptation ● Implementing systems for ongoing monitoring of AMS performance and adapting governance frameworks to evolving ethical and regulatory landscapes.
- Ethical Training and Education ● Providing training and education to employees on ethical considerations in algorithmic management.

Algorithmic Governance Maturity Model for SMBs
Maturity Level Level 1 ● Reactive |
Characteristics Ad-hoc ethical considerations, limited awareness of algorithmic risks, primarily focused on compliance. |
Focus Risk mitigation, avoiding immediate ethical crises. |
Challenges Lack of systematic approach, limited resources for ethical oversight, reactive rather than proactive. |
Next Steps Develop basic ethical principles, conduct initial risk assessments, raise awareness among leadership. |
Maturity Level Level 2 ● Developing |
Characteristics Emerging awareness of ethical implications, implementing initial governance policies and processes, beginning stakeholder engagement. |
Focus Establishing foundational governance structures, building internal capacity for ethical oversight. |
Challenges Resource constraints, integrating ethical considerations into existing workflows, overcoming organizational inertia. |
Next Steps Implement AIA framework, establish stakeholder engagement mechanisms, develop algorithmic accountability framework. |
Maturity Level Level 3 ● Mature |
Characteristics Systematic algorithmic governance framework in place, proactive risk management, active stakeholder engagement, focus on ethical innovation. |
Focus Value creation through ethical AMS, competitive differentiation, building trust and reputation. |
Challenges Maintaining momentum, adapting to evolving ethical and regulatory landscapes, scaling governance frameworks. |
Next Steps Enhance transparency and explainability, implement ethical review and audit processes, foster ethical innovation culture. |
Maturity Level Level 4 ● Leading |
Characteristics Algorithmic governance deeply embedded in organizational culture, recognized leader in ethical AMS practices, driving industry standards. |
Focus Shaping the future of ethical algorithmic management, contributing to broader societal good, maximizing long-term value creation. |
Challenges Sustaining leadership, navigating complex ethical dilemmas, fostering continuous improvement and innovation. |
Next Steps Share best practices, collaborate with industry peers, contribute to ethical standard development, advocate for responsible AI policies. |
The journey towards ethical algorithmic governance is a continuous process of learning, adaptation, and innovation. For SMBs, embracing this journey is not merely a matter of ethical responsibility; it is a strategic imperative for navigating the complexities of automated ecosystems and securing a sustainable and value-driven future. SMBs that proactively invest in algorithmic governance will not only mitigate ethical risks but also unlock new opportunities for innovation, differentiation, and long-term success in an increasingly algorithmically mediated world, forging a path where ethical considerations are not constraints but catalysts for growth and positive impact.

Reflection
Perhaps the most subversive ethical consideration for SMBs adopting algorithmic management is the quiet erosion of entrepreneurial spirit itself. The very essence of small business ● the gut feeling, the personal touch, the intuitive leap ● risks being algorithmically optimized into oblivion. While efficiency and data-driven decisions are valuable, the soul of an SMB often resides in the unquantifiable, the human element that algorithms, in their current form, struggle to grasp.
Is there a danger that in pursuing algorithmic perfection, SMBs inadvertently sacrifice the very qualities that made them unique and successful in the first place? This is a question worth pondering as SMBs navigate the algorithmic frontier ● ensuring that automation serves to enhance, not diminish, the human-centered values at their core.

References
- O’Neil, Cathy. Weapons of Math Destruction ● How Big Data Increases Inequality and Threatens Democracy. Crown, 2016.
- Zuboff, Shoshana. The Age of Surveillance Capitalism ● The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs, 2019.
- Eubanks, Virginia. Automating Inequality ● How High-Tech Tools Profile, Police, and Punish the Poor. St. Martin’s Press, 2018.
- Noble, Safiya Umoja. Algorithms of Oppression ● How Search Engines Reinforce Racism. NYU Press, 2018.
- Mittelstadt, Brent, et al. “The ethics of algorithms ● Current landscape, future directions.” Big & Society, vol. 4, no. 1, 2017, pp. 1-21.
Ethical algorithmic management is vital for SMBs to build trust, ensure fairness, and achieve sustainable growth in an automated business landscape.

Explore
What Ethical Dilemmas Arise From SMB Automation?
How Can SMBs Ensure Algorithmic System Transparency?
Why Should SMBs Prioritize Ethical Algorithmic Governance Frameworks?