Skip to main content

Fundamentals

Imagine a small bakery, “The Daily Crumb,” diligently tracking its daily sales. They note down every croissant, every loaf of sourdough, every cookie sold. One Tuesday, their sales report shows they sold 500 croissants, an astronomical jump from their usual 50. Instead of celebrating, the owner, Sarah, feels a knot of unease.

Five hundred croissants? That’s nearly impossible given their oven capacity and staffing. This improbable spike, this glaring anomaly in their sales data, is the first whisper of a issue. It’s a stark, immediate, and business-critical signal ● something is amiss with the information they’re using to run their business.

This abstract composition displays reflective elements suggestive of digital transformation impacting local businesses. Technology integrates AI to revolutionize supply chain management impacting productivity. Meeting collaboration helps enterprises address innovation trends within service and product delivery to customers and stakeholders.

The Immediate Red Flags ● Obvious Metric Anomalies

For any SMB, the most immediate indicators of data quality problems are often found lurking in plain sight, within the metrics they already monitor. These aren’t abstract concepts; they are the numbers that dictate daily operations and strategic decisions. Think of sales figures, website traffic, customer counts, or inventory levels.

When these metrics suddenly behave erratically, it’s akin to a flashing warning light on the business dashboard. These anomalies are not merely statistical blips; they are symptoms of potentially deeper data integrity issues.

Consider website analytics. A sudden, unexplained surge in website traffic might initially seem positive. However, a closer look could reveal that this traffic originates from bots or spam referrals, skewing conversion rates and marketing ROI calculations.

Similarly, a sharp decline in customer retention rate, without any apparent change in service or product quality, could point to inaccurate or flawed churn analysis. These metrics, when behaving unexpectedly, are the canaries in the data mine, signaling that the air might be growing toxic with bad information.

Sudden, inexplicable shifts in key are often the most immediate and actionable indicators of underlying data quality problems for SMBs.

Against a black background, the orb-like structure embodies automation strategy and digital transformation for growing a Business. The visual encapsulates technological solutions and process automation that provide competitive advantage and promote efficiency for enterprise corporations of all sizes, especially with operational optimization of local business and scaling business, offering a positive, innovative perspective on what automation and system integration can achieve in improving the future workplace and team's productivity through automation. The design represents success by enhancing operational agility, with efficient business systems.

Sales Performance ● The Revenue Thermometer

Sales metrics are the lifeblood of any SMB, acting as a direct reflection of business health. Declining rates, for example, can signal data quality issues within the sales pipeline. If leads are being misqualified due to incomplete or inaccurate data, sales teams waste time chasing dead ends, dragging down overall conversion. Average order value (AOV) is another sensitive metric.

A sudden drop in AOV might not just indicate changing customer preferences; it could also stem from errors in pricing data, product categorization, or even order processing systems. These sales-related metrics are not isolated numbers; they are interconnected indicators reflecting the accuracy and reliability of customer and product data.

Furthermore, sales cycle length, the time it takes to convert a lead into a customer, is a critical efficiency metric. An unexplained lengthening of the sales cycle could be symptomatic of data silos, where sales and marketing data are disconnected, leading to delays and inefficiencies in lead nurturing and follow-up. Inaccurate contact information, missing customer history, or duplicated records can all contribute to a sluggish sales process, directly impacting revenue generation. Sales metrics, therefore, serve as a crucial early warning system for data quality issues that directly impede revenue streams.

The abstract image contains geometric shapes in balance and presents as a model of the process. Blocks in burgundy and gray create a base for the entire tower of progress, standing for startup roots in small business operations. Balanced with cubes and rectangles of ivory, beige, dark tones and layers, capped by spheres in gray and red.

Customer Service Metrics ● The Voice of Data Dissatisfaction

Customer service metrics offer a different, but equally vital, perspective on data quality. High rates, for instance, might be attributed to poor product quality or service, but they can also be rooted in data quality problems. Inaccurate customer contact information can lead to missed communication, unresolved issues, and ultimately, customer frustration and defection. Similarly, increased customer complaint volume, particularly complaints related to billing errors or incorrect order fulfillment, often points directly to data inaccuracies within customer databases or transactional systems.

First call resolution (FCR) rate, a measure of how often customer issues are resolved during the initial contact, is another data quality-sensitive metric. If representatives lack access to complete and accurate customer histories, or if product information databases are outdated, resolving issues on the first call becomes significantly harder. This not only increases operational costs but also degrades customer experience. Customer satisfaction (CSAT) scores and Net Promoter Scores (NPS) are ultimately impacted by these data quality issues, reflecting a broader dissatisfaction that stems from inaccurate or incomplete customer data impacting service delivery.

Geometric spheres in varied shades construct an abstract of corporate scaling. Small business enterprises use strategic planning to achieve SMB success and growth. Technology drives process automation.

Operational Efficiency Metrics ● The Hidden Costs of Bad Data

Beyond sales and customer service, metrics are profoundly affected by data quality. Inventory management, for example, relies heavily on accurate stock level data. Discrepancies between recorded inventory and actual physical stock, often caused by data entry errors or system integration issues, can lead to stockouts, lost sales, and increased holding costs.

Order fulfillment metrics, such as order processing time and shipping accuracy, are also vulnerable to data quality problems. Incorrect shipping addresses, product mislabeling, or inaccurate inventory data can result in delayed deliveries, wrong shipments, and increased return rates, all adding up to operational inefficiencies and customer dissatisfaction.

Marketing campaign performance metrics are another area where data quality plays a crucial role. Low email open rates or click-through rates might be attributed to ineffective marketing copy, but they could also be caused by outdated or inaccurate email lists. Similarly, poor targeting in advertising campaigns, leading to low conversion rates, can stem from flawed based on incomplete or inaccurate demographic or behavioral data. Operational metrics, therefore, highlight the often-hidden costs of poor data quality, demonstrating its impact on efficiency, resource allocation, and ultimately, profitability.

Table 1 ● Business Metrics Indicating Data Quality Issues (Fundamentals)

Business Area Sales
Metric Sudden Spike in Sales Volume
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Data entry error, system glitch, inaccurate recording
Business Area Sales
Metric Decreasing Sales Conversion Rate
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Misqualified leads due to incomplete data, inaccurate lead scoring
Business Area Sales
Metric Lengthening Sales Cycle
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Data silos, inaccurate contact information, missing customer history
Business Area Customer Service
Metric High Customer Churn Rate
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Inaccurate contact information, missed communication, unresolved issues
Business Area Customer Service
Metric Increased Customer Complaint Volume
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Billing errors, incorrect order fulfillment due to data inaccuracies
Business Area Customer Service
Metric Low First Call Resolution Rate
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Incomplete customer histories, outdated product information
Business Area Operations
Metric Inventory Discrepancies
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Data entry errors, system integration issues, inaccurate stock levels
Business Area Operations
Metric Order Fulfillment Errors
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Incorrect shipping addresses, product mislabeling, inaccurate inventory data
Business Area Marketing
Metric Low Email Open/Click-Through Rates
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Outdated email lists, inaccurate contact information
Business Area Marketing
Metric Poor Advertising Campaign Conversion
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Flawed customer segmentation, incomplete demographic data
Business Area Website
Metric Sudden Traffic Surge with Low Conversions
Potential Data Quality Issue Indicated Bot traffic, spam referrals skewing metrics

For SMBs, paying close attention to these fundamental business metrics is not about chasing vanity numbers; it’s about ensuring the data they rely on to make critical decisions is trustworthy. These metrics are the first line of defense against the insidious creep of bad data, offering actionable insights for immediate improvement and laying the groundwork for more sophisticated strategies as the business grows.

Intermediate

Beyond the readily apparent anomalies in fundamental metrics, a deeper dive into business operations reveals more subtle, yet equally impactful, indicators of data quality issues. For a growing SMB, data becomes increasingly complex and interconnected, flowing across various systems and departments. At this stage, the symptoms of poor data quality are less likely to be dramatic spikes or dips, and more likely to manifest as inefficiencies, inconsistencies, and a gradual erosion of trust in data-driven decision-making. The initial, obvious red flags give way to a more nuanced understanding of how data quality impacts business performance.

This represents streamlined growth strategies for SMB entities looking at optimizing their business process with automated workflows and a digital first strategy. The color fan visualizes the growth, improvement and development using technology to create solutions. It shows scale up processes of growing a business that builds a competitive advantage.

Process Bottlenecks and Inefficiencies ● The Data Flow Obstruction

As SMBs scale, business processes become more intricate, often relying on data integration across multiple systems ● CRM, ERP, platforms, and more. Data quality issues at this stage frequently manifest as bottlenecks and inefficiencies within these processes. Consider order processing ● if customer data is inconsistently formatted across CRM and order management systems, manual intervention becomes necessary to reconcile discrepancies.

This slows down order processing, increases error rates, and consumes valuable employee time. Similarly, in marketing automation, if lead data is not accurately synced between marketing and sales platforms, lead nurturing campaigns can become disjointed, leading to missed opportunities and wasted marketing spend.

Reporting delays are another common symptom. If data quality is poor, data analysts spend excessive time cleaning and validating data before generating reports. This not only delays access to crucial business insights but also reduces the agility of decision-making. Imagine a scenario where a marketing team needs to assess the performance of a recent campaign to make real-time adjustments.

If data is riddled with errors or inconsistencies, the reporting process becomes cumbersome, and the window of opportunity for optimization might close before actionable insights are available. These process-level inefficiencies, often masked by manual workarounds, are a significant drain on resources and a clear indicator of underlying data quality problems.

Process inefficiencies and reporting delays, often hidden by manual workarounds, are key indicators of data quality issues in scaling SMBs.

An image depicts a balanced model for success, essential for Small Business. A red sphere within the ring atop two bars emphasizes the harmony achieved when Growth meets Strategy. The interplay between a light cream and dark grey bar represents decisions to innovate.

Data Silos and Inconsistencies ● The Fragmented Truth

Data silos, where data is fragmented and isolated within different departments or systems, are a common challenge for growing SMBs. These silos are not merely organizational issues; they are often exacerbated by, and symptomatic of, data quality problems. Inconsistent data definitions across departments, for example, can lead to conflicting reports and misaligned strategies.

Sales might define “customer” differently than marketing, leading to discrepancies in customer counts and revenue attribution. Similarly, product data might be maintained differently in inventory management and e-commerce systems, causing inconsistencies in product descriptions, pricing, and availability information displayed to customers.

Data duplication is another manifestation of and poor data quality. Customer records might be duplicated across CRM, marketing automation, and customer service systems, leading to fragmented customer views and inefficient communication. Marketing campaigns might target the same customer multiple times, while customer service representatives might lack a complete history of customer interactions, hindering their ability to provide personalized support. These data inconsistencies, arising from siloed data management practices, not only create operational inefficiencies but also erode the single source of truth necessary for effective data-driven decision-making.

Precariously stacked geometrical shapes represent the growth process. Different blocks signify core areas like team dynamics, financial strategy, and marketing within a growing SMB enterprise. A glass sphere could signal forward-looking business planning and technology.

Erosion of Data Trust ● The Silent Sabotage

Perhaps the most insidious indicator of data quality issues at the intermediate stage is the gradual erosion of trust in data itself. When employees repeatedly encounter inaccurate, incomplete, or inconsistent data, they begin to question the reliability of all data. This leads to a decline in data utilization, as employees revert to gut feeling or anecdotal evidence for decision-making.

Data-driven initiatives, such as implementing new CRM systems or adopting advanced analytics tools, can be undermined if users lack confidence in the underlying data. The initial enthusiasm for data-driven insights wanes, replaced by skepticism and a reluctance to rely on data for critical business decisions.

This erosion of is not always immediately quantifiable, but its impact is profound. It stifles innovation, hinders process optimization, and ultimately limits the SMB’s ability to leverage data as a strategic asset. Employees might spend time manually verifying data before using it, further exacerbating inefficiencies.

Decision-makers might discount data-driven recommendations, leading to suboptimal choices based on incomplete or biased information. This silent sabotage, the gradual undermining of data trust, is a critical indicator that data quality issues are not merely operational inconveniences, but strategic impediments to growth and scalability.

List 1 ● Intermediate Data Quality Issue Indicators

  1. Increased Manual Data Reconciliation Efforts across systems.
  2. Prolonged Report Generation Times due to data cleaning.
  3. Conflicting Reports from different departments using the same data.
  4. Inconsistent Data Definitions across systems and teams.
  5. Data Duplication across multiple platforms.
  6. Decreased Employee Reliance on Data for decision-making.
  7. Skepticism Towards Data-Driven Initiatives.
  8. Increased Time Spent Manually Verifying Data before use.
  9. Suboptimal Decisions made due to distrust in data accuracy.
  10. Slower Process Completion Times due to data errors.
This abstract image offers a peek into a small business conference room, revealing a strategic meeting involving planning and collaboration. Desktops and strewn business papers around table signal engagement with SMB and team strategy for a business owner. The minimalist modern style is synonymous with streamlined workflow and innovation.

Advanced Metrics ● Quantifying the Intangible

To move beyond symptom identification and proactively manage data quality, SMBs need to adopt more advanced metrics that quantify the intangible aspects of data quality. tracking, for example, provides visibility into the origin and transformation of data as it flows through various systems. This allows businesses to pinpoint the source of data quality issues and understand the impact of data errors across the data pipeline.

Data freshness metrics, measuring the timeliness of data updates, are crucial for real-time decision-making. Stale data can lead to outdated insights and missed opportunities, particularly in dynamic business environments.

Data accuracy metrics, while seemingly straightforward, become more complex at this stage. Simply measuring error rates might not be sufficient. Contextual accuracy, the degree to which data is accurate within its specific business context, becomes more important. For example, a customer address might be technically valid but outdated, rendering it inaccurate for shipping purposes.

Data completeness metrics also evolve beyond simple missing value counts. Business rule validation, ensuring data adheres to predefined business rules and constraints, becomes essential for maintaining data integrity and consistency across the organization. These advanced metrics provide a more granular and actionable understanding of data quality, enabling proactive monitoring and improvement efforts.

Table 2 ● Business Metrics Indicating Data Quality Issues (Intermediate)

Metric Category Process Efficiency
Specific Metric Manual Data Reconciliation Time
Description Time spent manually correcting data inconsistencies across systems.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Integration, Consistency
Metric Category Reporting
Specific Metric Report Generation Latency
Description Delay between data availability and report delivery.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Timeliness, Accuracy
Metric Category Data Consistency
Specific Metric Cross-System Data Discrepancy Rate
Description Percentage of data records differing across integrated systems.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Consistency, Integration
Metric Category Data Governance
Specific Metric Business Rule Violation Rate
Description Frequency of data failing to meet predefined business rules.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Validity, Integrity
Metric Category Data Lineage
Specific Metric Data Provenance Completeness
Description Percentage of data elements with fully traceable origins and transformations.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Lineage, Transparency
Metric Category Data Freshness
Specific Metric Data Staleness Rate
Description Percentage of data records that are outdated beyond acceptable thresholds.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Timeliness, Accuracy
Metric Category Data Accuracy
Specific Metric Contextual Accuracy Score
Description Measure of data accuracy within specific business use cases.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Accuracy, Relevance
Metric Category Data Completeness
Specific Metric Business Rule Coverage
Description Percentage of critical business rules validated against data.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Completeness, Validity
Metric Category Data Trust
Specific Metric Data Usage Rate
Description Frequency of data being actively used in decision-making processes.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Trust, Adoption

By tracking these intermediate-level metrics, SMBs can transition from reactive firefighting to proactive data quality management. This shift is essential for sustained growth and effective automation, allowing businesses to build a solid data foundation for future scalability and strategic advantage. The focus moves from simply identifying problems to understanding the root causes and implementing systematic solutions, paving the way for a more data-mature organization.

Advanced

For organizations operating at scale, data quality transcends operational efficiency; it becomes a strategic imperative deeply intertwined with innovation, competitive advantage, and long-term sustainability. At this advanced stage, the metrics indicating data quality issues are no longer confined to immediate operational disruptions or process bottlenecks. Instead, they are reflected in subtle shifts in strategic performance, predictive model accuracy, and the overall agility of the organization to adapt to evolving market dynamics. The lens through which data quality is viewed expands from tactical problem-solving to strategic risk mitigation and value creation.

This arrangement presents a forward looking automation innovation for scaling business success in small and medium-sized markets. Featuring components of neutral toned equipment combined with streamlined design, the image focuses on data visualization and process automation indicators, with a scaling potential block. The technology-driven layout shows opportunities in growth hacking for streamlining business transformation, emphasizing efficient workflows.

Predictive Model Degradation ● The Algorithm’s Warning

In data-driven organizations, are increasingly deployed across various functions, from demand forecasting and customer churn prediction to fraud detection and risk assessment. The performance of these models is exquisitely sensitive to data quality. Data drift, the phenomenon where the statistical properties of production data change over time, is a significant data quality challenge in advanced analytics.

As data drifts, predictive models trained on historical data become less accurate, leading to degraded model performance and potentially flawed business decisions. Monitoring model accuracy metrics, such as precision, recall, and F1-score, over time is crucial for detecting data drift and identifying underlying data quality issues.

Bias in training data is another critical concern. If training data reflects existing biases, predictive models will perpetuate and amplify these biases, leading to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. This is particularly relevant in areas like hiring, loan applications, and customer segmentation.

Fairness metrics, designed to assess and mitigate bias in predictive models, become essential indicators of data quality and practices. A decline in predictive model performance, or the detection of increasing bias, is a strong signal that underlying data quality issues are impacting not just operational efficiency, but also strategic decision-making and ethical considerations.

Degradation in predictive model accuracy and increasing bias are advanced indicators of data quality issues impacting strategic decision-making and ethical AI practices.

An image illustrating interconnected shapes demonstrates strategic approaches vital for transitioning from Small Business to a Medium Business enterprise, emphasizing structured growth. The visualization incorporates strategic planning with insightful data analytics to showcase modern workflow efficiency achieved through digital transformation. This abstract design features smooth curves and layered shapes reflecting a process of deliberate Scaling that drives competitive advantage for Entrepreneurs.

Data Governance and Compliance Metrics ● The Regulatory Compass

For large organizations, and are paramount. play a crucial role in ensuring adherence to data governance policies and regulatory requirements, such as GDPR, CCPA, and HIPAA. Data access control metrics, measuring the effectiveness of data access policies and procedures, are essential for preventing unauthorized data access and data breaches.

Data security incident rates, while not directly measuring data quality, are often correlated with data quality issues. Poorly managed data is more vulnerable to security breaches and data loss.

Data retention policy compliance metrics, ensuring data is retained and disposed of according to regulatory requirements, are also critical. Failure to comply with data retention policies can lead to legal and financial penalties. Data audit trail completeness, tracking data changes and access events, is crucial for demonstrating data governance and compliance.

Incomplete or inaccurate audit trails can hinder regulatory audits and investigations. These data governance and compliance metrics provide a framework for assessing data quality from a risk management and regulatory perspective, highlighting the strategic importance of data quality in maintaining organizational integrity and legal compliance.

The image depicts a wavy texture achieved through parallel blocks, ideal for symbolizing a process-driven approach to business growth in SMB companies. Rows suggest structured progression towards operational efficiency and optimization powered by innovative business automation. Representing digital tools as critical drivers for business development, workflow optimization, and enhanced productivity in the workplace.

Return on Investment (ROI) of Data Quality Initiatives ● The Value Proposition

At the advanced stage, data quality is not just a cost center; it is a strategic investment that should deliver measurable business value. Tracking the ROI of becomes essential for justifying investments and demonstrating the strategic impact of data quality management. quality (COPDQ) metrics, quantifying the financial impact of data errors, provide a baseline for measuring the benefits of data quality improvements. These metrics can include costs associated with rework, errors, lost sales, customer churn, and regulatory fines.

Data quality improvement metrics, measuring the progress of data quality initiatives over time, are crucial for tracking ROI. These metrics can include improvements in data accuracy, completeness, consistency, and timeliness. Business outcome metrics, directly linking data quality improvements to tangible business results, provide the ultimate measure of ROI.

For example, improved data quality in CRM systems can lead to increased sales conversion rates, higher customer retention, and improved marketing campaign ROI. By rigorously tracking the ROI of data quality initiatives, organizations can demonstrate the strategic value of data quality management and secure ongoing investment in programs.

List 2 ● Advanced Data Quality Issue Indicators

Table 3 ● Business Metrics Indicating Data Quality Issues (Advanced)

Metric Category Predictive Modeling
Specific Metric Model Accuracy Degradation Rate
Description Rate at which predictive model accuracy declines over time.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Drift, Data Accuracy
Strategic Impact Strategic Forecasting, Risk Assessment
Metric Category Predictive Modeling
Specific Metric Model Bias Score
Description Quantified measure of bias in predictive model outputs.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Bias, Data Fairness
Strategic Impact Ethical AI, Reputation Risk
Metric Category Data Governance
Specific Metric Data Access Control Effectiveness
Description Measure of how effectively data access policies are enforced.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Security, Data Governance
Strategic Impact Regulatory Compliance, Data Security
Metric Category Data Governance
Specific Metric Data Retention Compliance Rate
Description Percentage of data retention policies adhered to.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Governance, Data Compliance
Strategic Impact Legal Risk, Financial Penalties
Metric Category Financial Performance
Specific Metric Cost of Poor Data Quality (COPDQ)
Description Quantified financial impact of data errors and inefficiencies.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Accuracy, Data Completeness
Strategic Impact Profitability, Operational Efficiency
Metric Category Investment ROI
Specific Metric Data Quality Initiative ROI
Description Return on investment from data quality improvement projects.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Quality Improvement, Business Value
Strategic Impact Strategic Investment Justification
Metric Category Data Agility
Specific Metric Data Latency in Strategic Reporting
Description Delay in accessing timely data for strategic decision-making.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Timeliness, Data Availability
Strategic Impact Strategic Agility, Competitive Response
Metric Category Competitive Advantage
Specific Metric Data-Driven Innovation Rate
Description Speed and effectiveness of leveraging data for innovation.
Data Quality Aspect Indicated Data Quality, Data Accessibility
Strategic Impact Innovation, Market Leadership

At this advanced level, data quality is no longer viewed as a technical problem to be solved, but as a strategic asset to be managed and optimized. The metrics used to monitor data quality reflect this strategic perspective, focusing on predictive model performance, regulatory compliance, and the ROI of data quality initiatives. By embracing these advanced metrics, organizations can transform data quality from a cost of doing business into a driver of innovation, competitive advantage, and sustained strategic success. The journey from reactive problem-solving to proactive strategic data quality management is complete, culminating in a data-centric organization where data quality is deeply embedded in the organizational DNA.

Reflection

Perhaps the most uncomfortable truth about data quality is that it is not solely a technical problem; it is a deeply human one. We obsess over algorithms, infrastructure, and validation rules, yet often overlook the fundamental source of data quality issues ● human error, bias, and misunderstanding. Metrics, dashboards, and automated checks are essential tools, but they are only as effective as the human processes and behaviors that underpin them. The real challenge for SMBs, and indeed organizations of all sizes, is not just to measure data quality, but to cultivate a data quality culture.

This means fostering a shared understanding of data’s value, promoting data literacy across all levels, and incentivizing data stewardship as a core organizational competency. Without this human element, even the most sophisticated metrics will merely illuminate symptoms, not cure the underlying ailment. Data quality, at its heart, is a reflection of organizational discipline and a commitment to truth, a pursuit that transcends technology and delves into the very essence of how we operate and make decisions.

Data Governance Metrics, Predictive Model Degradation, Cost of Poor Data Quality

Erratic sales, customer churn, process delays, and predictive model failures signal data quality issues impacting SMB operations and strategy.

This abstract display mirrors operational processes designed for scaling a small or medium business. A strategic visual presents interlocking elements representative of innovation and scaling solutions within a company. A red piece emphasizes sales growth within expanding business potential.

Explore

What Business Metrics Best Reveal Data Quality Issues?
How Do Data Quality Metrics Impact SMB Automation Efforts?
Why Is Data Quality Measurement Crucial For Long Term SMB Growth?