Fundamentals

Imagine a local bakery, its aroma spilling onto the street, a cornerstone of community life; yet, its true contribution often remains unquantified beyond mere profit margins. This scenario highlights a critical gap for small to medium-sized businesses (SMBs) ● understanding and articulating their broader impact. Social Return on Investment Meaning ● SROI for SMBs: Measuring wider value beyond profit, for sustainable growth. (SROI) emerges as a methodology attempting to bridge this divide, promising a framework to measure value that extends beyond financial returns. However, the question persists ● to what extent can SROI genuinely capture the diverse and often subtle impacts of SMBs?

Defining SROI for SMBs

SROI, at its core, is a principles-based method for measuring and reporting on social, environmental, and economic value created by an organization. For an SMB owner, this might sound like corporate jargon, disconnected from the daily grind of running a business. Let’s simplify it. Think about your business beyond just making money.

Consider the jobs you create, the local suppliers you support, or the skills you teach your employees. SROI aims to put a value on these contributions, translating them into a ratio that compares the total value created to the investment made.

SROI seeks to quantify the broader value an SMB generates for its community and stakeholders, moving beyond simple profit calculations.

For instance, a small coffee shop might invest in training programs for baristas from disadvantaged backgrounds. Traditional accounting would only see the cost of training and the revenue from coffee sales. SROI, however, would also attempt to measure the social value created by providing employment opportunities, increasing the baristas’ skills and confidence, and potentially reducing unemployment in the local area. This expanded view offers a richer understanding of the coffee shop’s role in society.

The Allure of Quantification

Why bother with quantifying social impact? For SMBs, the appeal of SROI lies in several potential benefits. Firstly, it provides a structured way to understand and communicate their value proposition. In a competitive market, highlighting social impact Meaning ● Social impact, within the SMB sphere, represents the measurable effect a company's actions have on society and the environment. can differentiate an SMB and attract customers who are increasingly conscious of ethical and social considerations.

Secondly, SROI can aid in decision-making. By understanding the social and environmental consequences of different business choices, SMBs can make more informed decisions that align with their values and long-term sustainability. Thirdly, in an era where transparency is valued, SROI can offer accountability to stakeholders, including customers, employees, and the local community. It’s a way of showing, not just telling, that an SMB is a responsible and valuable member of society.

Practical Challenges for SMB Implementation

Despite the potential benefits, implementing SROI in SMBs presents significant practical challenges. Resource constraints are paramount. SMBs often operate with lean teams and tight budgets. Conducting a thorough SROI analysis can be time-consuming and require specialized expertise, which may be financially prohibitive for many small businesses.

Data collection poses another hurdle. SROI requires gathering data on a range of social and environmental outcomes, which may not be readily available or easily quantifiable. For example, measuring the increase in employee confidence or the reduction in community crime rates due to an SMB’s initiatives can be complex and subjective. Furthermore, there is no universally standardized SROI methodology. Different approaches exist, and choosing the right one and ensuring its credibility can be daunting for SMBs lacking in-house expertise.

Consider a small retail store aiming to implement SROI. They might want to measure the impact of sourcing products from local artisans. This requires tracking not only sales but also the economic benefits to the artisans, the environmental impact of local production versus mass production, and the social value of supporting local craftsmanship. Collecting this data, analyzing it rigorously, and then communicating it effectively requires resources and skills that many SMBs simply do not possess.

Subjectivity and the Nature of Value

A fundamental question underpinning SROI is the inherent subjectivity in defining and valuing social impact. What constitutes “social value” can vary depending on stakeholder perspectives and cultural contexts. Assigning monetary values to social outcomes, such as improved community well-being or enhanced environmental quality, involves value judgments that can be contested. While SROI methodologies strive for rigor and transparency, the inherent subjectivity cannot be entirely eliminated.

For SMBs, this means that SROI results should be interpreted with caution and presented with clear explanations of the assumptions and value judgments made. It’s crucial to recognize that SROI provides an estimate of social value, not an absolute, objective measure.

For example, valuing the environmental impact of an SMB’s waste reduction program involves decisions about which environmental outcomes to measure (e.g., carbon emissions, water pollution, landfill waste), how to measure them, and what monetary value to assign to each unit of reduction. These choices inevitably involve subjective judgments and can influence the final SROI ratio. Transparency about these choices is essential for building trust and ensuring the credibility of SROI results.

SROI as a Tool for Strategic SMB Growth

Despite these challenges, SROI can still be a valuable tool for SMBs, particularly when integrated into their strategic growth plans. Rather than viewing SROI as a purely external reporting exercise, SMBs can leverage it as an internal management tool to improve their operations and enhance their social impact. By identifying and measuring key social and environmental outcomes, SMBs can gain insights into what works well, what needs improvement, and how to allocate resources more effectively. SROI can also facilitate communication and collaboration within the SMB, aligning employees around a shared understanding of the business’s broader purpose and impact.

Imagine a small manufacturing company using SROI to evaluate the impact of a new employee wellness program. By tracking outcomes such as employee absenteeism, productivity, and job satisfaction, the company can assess the program’s effectiveness and return on investment, not just in terms of financial savings but also in terms of improved employee well-being Meaning ● Employee Well-being in SMBs is a strategic asset, driving growth and resilience through healthy, happy, and engaged employees. and morale. This data can then inform decisions about program adjustments and future investments in employee well-being initiatives.

Automation and SROI Implementation

Automation can play a crucial role in making SROI more accessible and practical for SMBs. Technology can streamline data collection, analysis, and reporting processes, reducing the time and resource burden associated with SROI implementation. Software platforms and digital tools are emerging that can automate aspects of SROI analysis, making it more affordable and user-friendly for SMBs. Furthermore, automation can enhance the accuracy and consistency of SROI calculations, reducing the risk of errors and biases.

However, it’s important to recognize that automation is not a panacea. SROI still requires human judgment and contextual understanding, particularly in defining relevant outcomes and interpreting results. Automation should be seen as a tool to support, not replace, human expertise in SROI implementation.

For example, an SMB could use online surveys to collect data from stakeholders, cloud-based software to manage and analyze SROI data, and automated reporting tools to generate SROI reports. These technologies can significantly reduce the manual effort involved in SROI, making it more feasible for SMBs to integrate social impact measurement into their operations. However, careful selection of appropriate tools and training in their effective use are essential for successful automation of SROI processes.

The Extent of SROI’s Quantification

To return to the central question ● to what extent does SROI quantify SMB impact? The answer is nuanced. SROI offers a valuable framework for structuring and communicating the broader value of SMBs, moving beyond purely financial metrics. It can provide insights into social and environmental outcomes that are often overlooked in traditional business assessments.

However, SROI is not a perfect or complete quantification. It involves subjective judgments, relies on data that may be imperfect or incomplete, and can be resource-intensive to implement thoroughly. Therefore, SROI should be viewed as a tool for enhancing understanding and informing decisions, rather than as a definitive or absolute measure of SMB impact. Its value lies in its ability to broaden the lens through which SMBs view their contributions to society, prompting them to consider and manage their social and environmental responsibilities more strategically.

Ultimately, the extent to which SROI effectively quantifies SMB impact depends on how it is implemented and interpreted. When used thoughtfully, transparently, and with a clear understanding of its limitations, SROI can be a powerful tool for SMBs seeking to grow sustainably and create positive social change. It’s about using the framework to ask better questions, make more informed decisions, and tell a more complete story of an SMB’s value in the world.

Navigating SROI Complexity for Strategic Advantage

The initial foray into Social Return on Investment Meaning ● Return on Investment (ROI) gauges the profitability of an investment, crucial for SMBs evaluating growth initiatives. for Small and Medium Businesses often reveals a landscape richer and more challenging than anticipated. While the fundamental principles of SROI offer an appealing framework for quantifying broader impact, the practical application within the dynamic and resource-constrained environment of SMBs demands a more sophisticated understanding. Moving beyond basic definitions, the intermediate stage of SROI engagement requires grappling with methodological intricacies, strategic integration, and the nuanced interpretation of results to truly leverage its potential.

Deep Dive into SROI Methodologies

SROI is not a monolithic methodology; rather, it encompasses a spectrum of approaches, each with its own strengths and limitations. Understanding these variations is crucial for SMBs to select the most appropriate method for their specific context and objectives. Outcome mapping, for instance, provides a participatory approach, emphasizing stakeholder engagement Meaning ● Stakeholder engagement is the continuous process of building relationships with interested parties to co-create value and ensure SMB success. in defining and valuing outcomes. This can be particularly valuable for SMBs seeking to build stronger community relationships and ensure their SROI analysis reflects local priorities.

Conversely, the Social Accounting and Audit method offers a more structured framework, focusing on accountability and transparency through rigorous data collection and verification. This approach might appeal to SMBs operating in sectors with heightened scrutiny or those seeking to demonstrate impact to external investors or grant funders.

Selecting the right SROI methodology is not a matter of finding the “best” approach, but rather identifying the method that aligns most effectively with an SMB’s specific goals, resources, and stakeholder context.

Furthermore, the choice between prospective and retrospective SROI analysis significantly impacts the process and outcomes. Prospective SROI, conducted before an initiative is implemented, serves as a planning tool, helping SMBs to anticipate potential social and environmental impacts and optimize their strategies accordingly. Retrospective SROI, performed after an initiative has been completed, provides an evaluation of actual impact, offering valuable insights for learning and improvement. SMBs might benefit from utilizing both approaches at different stages of their development, employing prospective SROI for strategic planning and retrospective SROI for performance measurement and accountability.

Integrating SROI into SMB Strategy

For SROI to move beyond a standalone reporting exercise and become a driver of strategic advantage, SMBs must integrate it deeply into their core business processes. This requires embedding SROI principles into strategic planning, operational decision-making, and performance management systems. Instead of treating SROI as an add-on, SMBs should view it as an integral part of their business model, informing how they create value for all stakeholders. This strategic integration Meaning ● Strategic Integration: Aligning SMB functions for unified goals, efficiency, and sustainable growth. necessitates a shift in mindset, moving from a purely profit-centric approach to a more holistic perspective that recognizes the interconnectedness of financial, social, and environmental performance.

Consider an SMB in the tourism sector. Strategically integrating SROI might involve incorporating social and environmental impact considerations into their tour design, supplier selection, and customer engagement strategies. For example, they could prioritize partnerships with local communities, minimize their environmental footprint through sustainable practices, and offer tours that educate and empower both tourists and local residents. By measuring and managing their social and environmental performance through SROI, they can differentiate themselves in the market, attract environmentally and socially conscious travelers, and build long-term resilience.

Addressing Data Rigor and Materiality

A critical aspect of robust SROI implementation is ensuring data rigor and focusing on material outcomes. While complete objectivity in social impact measurement may be elusive, SMBs should strive for data collection and analysis methods that are as rigorous and reliable as possible within their resource constraints. This involves clearly defining indicators, utilizing appropriate data sources, and employing transparent and defensible valuation techniques.

Furthermore, materiality assessment is crucial to focus SROI efforts on the outcomes that are most significant to stakeholders and most relevant to the SMB’s strategic objectives. Trying to measure everything can dilute the focus and resources, diminishing the value of the SROI analysis.

For instance, an SMB operating a restaurant might initially consider measuring a wide range of social and environmental outcomes, from food waste to employee well-being to community engagement. However, a materiality assessment, involving stakeholder consultations and a review of industry best practices, might reveal that food waste reduction and local sourcing are the most material issues for their customers and community. Focusing their SROI efforts on these key areas allows them to gather more robust data, conduct a more in-depth analysis, and generate more meaningful insights.

Stakeholder Engagement and Participatory Approaches

Effective SROI is inherently stakeholder-centric. Engaging stakeholders in the SROI process is not merely a procedural step but a fundamental principle that enhances the relevance, credibility, and utility of the analysis. Participatory approaches, where stakeholders are actively involved in defining outcomes, selecting indicators, and interpreting results, can lead to a more nuanced and comprehensive understanding of impact.

This collaborative process also fosters ownership and buy-in, increasing the likelihood that SROI findings will be acted upon and contribute to positive change. For SMBs, stakeholder engagement can range from informal consultations with customers and employees to more structured workshops with community groups and suppliers.

Imagine an SMB providing childcare services. Engaging parents, staff, and children in the SROI process can provide valuable insights into the outcomes that matter most to them. Parents might prioritize children’s development and well-being, staff might focus on job satisfaction and professional growth, and even children, through age-appropriate methods, can contribute to understanding the impact of the services on their lives. This participatory approach ensures that the SROI analysis captures the diverse perspectives of key stakeholders and reflects the lived experiences of those affected by the SMB’s operations.

Automation Tools for Enhanced Efficiency

As SMBs progress in their SROI journey, the need for efficient and scalable implementation becomes increasingly apparent. Automation tools Meaning ● Automation Tools, within the sphere of SMB growth, represent software solutions and digital instruments designed to streamline and automate repetitive business tasks, minimizing manual intervention. and software solutions offer significant potential to streamline SROI processes, reduce manual effort, and enhance data management. Cloud-based platforms, for example, can facilitate data collection through online surveys and mobile apps, automate calculations, and generate reports. These tools can also improve data visualization and communication, making SROI findings more accessible and understandable to a wider audience.

However, it is crucial to select automation tools that are aligned with the chosen SROI methodology and that do not compromise the rigor or stakeholder engagement aspects of the analysis. Technology should be seen as an enabler, not a replacement for sound SROI principles and practices.

An SMB cooperative of farmers, for instance, could utilize a mobile app to collect data from member farmers on their yields, input costs, and environmental practices. This data can then be automatically aggregated and analyzed using SROI software, generating reports on the cooperative’s overall social, environmental, and economic impact. Automation not only reduces the administrative burden but also enables real-time monitoring of performance and facilitates data-driven decision-making for continuous improvement.

Interpreting and Communicating SROI Results

The culmination of the SROI process lies in the interpretation and communication of results. The SROI ratio, while a key metric, should not be viewed in isolation. It is essential to contextualize the ratio, explaining the underlying assumptions, data limitations, and value judgments that have shaped the analysis.

Effective communication of SROI findings requires tailoring the message to different audiences, using clear and accessible language, and highlighting the narrative behind the numbers. For SMBs, communicating SROI results can be a powerful tool for building trust, attracting customers, and engaging investors who are increasingly interested in social and environmental impact.

The SROI ratio is a starting point for a deeper conversation about value creation, not an end in itself.

Consider an SMB social enterprise focused on providing employment for people with disabilities. While their SROI ratio might be a compelling headline figure, the real power of their SROI communication lies in telling the stories of the individuals whose lives have been transformed through employment opportunities. Sharing these stories, alongside the quantitative data, brings the SROI results to life and resonates more deeply with stakeholders, demonstrating the human impact of the SMB’s mission.

The Evolving Landscape of SROI and SMBs

The application of SROI in the SMB sector is an evolving field, with ongoing developments in methodologies, tools, and best practices. As awareness of social and environmental responsibility grows, and as stakeholders increasingly demand accountability, SROI is likely to become an even more relevant and valuable tool for SMBs. Staying abreast of these developments, engaging with SROI practitioners and networks, and continuously learning and adapting are essential for SMBs to maximize the benefits of SROI and navigate its complexities effectively. The journey into SROI is not a static destination but a continuous process of learning, improvement, and strategic evolution.

Ultimately, the extent to which SROI quantifies SMB impact at the intermediate level hinges on the depth of engagement, the rigor of implementation, and the strategic integration of SROI principles into the business. Moving beyond superficial application requires a commitment to methodological soundness, stakeholder participation, and a genuine desire to understand and enhance the broader value that SMBs create for society and the environment. It is in this deeper engagement that SROI truly unlocks its potential to drive strategic advantage Meaning ● Strategic Advantage, in the realm of SMB growth, automation, and implementation, represents a business's unique capacity to consistently outperform competitors by leveraging distinct resources, competencies, or strategies; for a small business, this often means identifying niche markets or operational efficiencies achievable through targeted automation. and contribute to a more sustainable and equitable economy.

Deconstructing SROI’s Quantificatory Reach in the SMB Ecosystem

Beyond the foundational understanding and strategic integration of Social Return on Investment, a critical examination of its quantificatory capacity within the Small and Medium Business landscape necessitates a deeper, more critical lens. The advanced discourse on SROI for SMBs transcends mere methodological application, venturing into the epistemological underpinnings of value measurement, the inherent limitations of quantification in complex social systems, and the strategic implications of embracing, or indeed challenging, the SROI paradigm. This level of analysis demands engagement with academic rigor, critical business theory, and a nuanced appreciation for the multifaceted nature of SMB impact.

Epistemological Challenges in SROI Valuation

At its core, SROI grapples with the fundamental epistemological challenge of assigning commensurable values to incommensurable phenomena. The attempt to translate diverse social, environmental, and economic outcomes into a single monetary metric inherently involves a process of reductionism. While proponents argue that this simplification facilitates comparison and communication, critics raise concerns about the potential for oversimplification and the obscuring of crucial qualitative dimensions of impact.

The very act of valuation is not a neutral, objective exercise but rather a value-laden process, influenced by underlying assumptions, cultural norms, and power dynamics. For SMBs, particularly those operating in diverse or marginalized communities, the epistemological assumptions embedded within SROI methodologies warrant careful scrutiny.

SROI’s quantificatory reach is inherently constrained by the epistemological limitations of translating qualitative social realities into quantitative metrics.

Drawing upon critical theory, we recognize that quantification itself can be a form of power, shaping perceptions of value and reinforcing dominant narratives. The language of numbers can lend an air of objectivity and authority, potentially masking the subjective and contested nature of social value judgments. SMBs must be critically aware of this potential for epistemological bias in SROI and strive for transparency and reflexivity in their application, acknowledging the inherent limitations of quantification and complementing quantitative data with rich qualitative narratives that capture the lived experiences of stakeholders.

The Limits of Quantification in Complex Systems

SMBs operate within complex adaptive systems, characterized by interconnectedness, feedback loops, and emergent properties. Attempting to isolate and quantify the impact of a single SMB intervention within such a system presents significant methodological challenges. Attribution and causality become particularly problematic. Social and environmental outcomes are often influenced by a multitude of factors, making it difficult to definitively attribute changes solely to the actions of an SMB.

Furthermore, unintended consequences and systemic effects, both positive and negative, may be overlooked when focusing narrowly on pre-defined outcomes. The linear, input-output model inherent in many SROI approaches may not adequately capture the dynamic and non-linear nature of impact within complex systems.

Complexity theory suggests that in such systems, emergent properties arise from the interactions of multiple agents, and these properties cannot be simply reduced to the sum of individual components. For example, the collective impact of multiple SMBs in a local ecosystem may be greater than the sum of their individual SROI ratios, due to synergistic effects and network externalities. Conversely, unintended negative consequences, such as increased competition or resource depletion, may emerge at the systemic level, even if individual SMBs demonstrate positive SROI. Advanced SROI analysis for SMBs must move beyond linear causality and embrace systems thinking, acknowledging the interconnectedness and emergent properties of the ecosystems in which they operate.

SROI and the Discourse of Neoliberalism

Critical business scholars have raised concerns about the potential for SROI to be co-opted within a neoliberal discourse, where social and environmental issues are framed primarily in terms of market-based solutions and financialized metrics. The emphasis on quantification and return on investment can inadvertently reinforce a focus on efficiency and economic value maximization, potentially overshadowing broader ethical and social justice considerations. There is a risk that SROI becomes a tool for “impact washing,” allowing SMBs to present a positive social image without fundamentally challenging or transforming underlying power structures or systemic inequalities.

From a critical management studies perspective, the adoption of SROI by SMBs can be viewed as part of a broader trend towards the financialization of social impact, where social and environmental concerns are increasingly integrated into market logics and investment frameworks. While this may attract capital and resources to address social problems, it also raises questions about the potential for commodification of social value and the erosion of non-market-based approaches to social change. SMBs engaging with SROI must be mindful of these critiques and strive to utilize the methodology in a way that genuinely advances social and environmental justice, rather than simply reinforcing neoliberal paradigms.

Alternative Frameworks and Complementary Approaches

Acknowledging the limitations of SROI’s quantificatory reach does not negate its potential value, but rather necessitates a more nuanced and critical approach. SMBs should consider SROI as one tool among many, complementing it with other frameworks and approaches that capture different dimensions of impact and address its inherent limitations. Qualitative research methods, such as case studies, participatory action research, and ethnographic studies, can provide richer and more contextualized understandings of social impact, capturing nuances and complexities that may be missed by quantitative metrics alone. Furthermore, alternative valuation frameworks, such as social accounting, wellbeing economics, and ecological economics, offer different perspectives on value creation, moving beyond purely monetary metrics and incorporating broader ethical and ecological considerations.

For instance, the capabilities approach, originating from development economics and ethics, emphasizes human flourishing and the expansion of individual capabilities as the ultimate measure of social progress. Applying this framework to SMB impact assessment would involve focusing on how SMBs contribute to enhancing the capabilities of their stakeholders, such as employees, customers, and community members, to live lives they have reason to value. This approach shifts the focus from monetary valuation to a more holistic and human-centered understanding of impact. SMBs can benefit from integrating such alternative frameworks alongside SROI to gain a more comprehensive and ethically grounded assessment of their contributions.

Automation and the Future of SROI for SMBs

While automation offers potential efficiencies in SROI implementation, advanced analysis must critically examine its implications for the quantificatory reach and epistemological underpinnings of SROI. Algorithmic bias, data limitations, and the potential for deskilling are important considerations. Automated SROI tools may rely on pre-defined metrics and valuation methods, potentially reinforcing existing biases and limiting the scope for context-specific adaptation. Furthermore, over-reliance on automation could diminish the crucial role of human judgment and stakeholder engagement in the SROI process, potentially undermining its participatory and ethical dimensions.

The future of SROI for SMBs lies in a balanced approach that leverages the benefits of automation while mitigating its risks. Advanced automation tools should be designed to be transparent, flexible, and adaptable, allowing for customization to specific SMB contexts and stakeholder priorities. Human oversight and critical review remain essential to ensure the validity, reliability, and ethical integrity of automated SROI processes.

Furthermore, research and development are needed to explore the potential of artificial intelligence and machine learning to enhance SROI methodologies, for example, through improved data analysis, predictive modeling, and the integration of qualitative and quantitative data. However, such advancements must be guided by a critical awareness of the epistemological and ethical implications of automating social value judgments.

Reconceptualizing Quantification ● Towards Qualitative Depth

Ultimately, the advanced discourse on SROI for SMBs challenges the very notion of quantification as the primary goal of impact assessment. Instead of striving for ever-more precise and comprehensive quantitative metrics, a more fruitful direction may lie in reconceptualizing quantification as a means to enhance qualitative understanding and deepen engagement with social complexity. Numbers can be valuable tools for illuminating patterns, highlighting trends, and facilitating communication, but they should not be mistaken for the totality of social reality. The true value of SROI, particularly for SMBs, may lie not in its ability to produce definitive quantitative ratios, but rather in its capacity to stimulate critical reflection, foster stakeholder dialogue, and drive strategic action towards more sustainable and equitable business practices.

The question, “To what extent does SROI quantify SMB impact?” therefore, transcends a simple yes or no answer. At an advanced level, it becomes an invitation to critically examine the very nature of quantification, its limitations, and its potential within the complex and dynamic context of SMBs. SROI’s quantificatory reach is bounded by epistemological constraints, methodological challenges, and the inherent complexities of social systems.

However, when approached with critical awareness, methodological rigor, and a commitment to ethical and participatory principles, SROI can still serve as a valuable tool for SMBs seeking to understand, manage, and enhance their broader contributions to society and the environment. The ultimate measure of SROI’s success lies not in the precision of its ratios, but in its capacity to catalyze positive change and contribute to a more just and sustainable world.

References

• Arvidson, M., & Lyon, F. (2014). Social impact measurement and non-profit organisations ● Towards managing for accountability. Public Management Review, 16(6), 917-941.
• Bugg-Levine, A., & Emerson, J. (2011). Impact investing ● Transforming how we make money while making a difference. John Wiley & Sons.
• Clark, C., Rosenzweig, W., Long, D., & Olsen, S. (2004). Double bottom line project report ● Assessing social impact in double bottom line ventures. Working Paper, Haas School of Business, University of California, Berkeley.
• Emerson, J. (2003). The blended value proposition ● Integrating social and financial returns. California Management Review, 45(4), 35-51.
• Epstein, M. J., & Rejc Buhovac, M. (2014). Managing social sustainability ● A stakeholder approach. Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Millar, J., & Hall, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI) methodology ● A critical review. Valuation Journal, 8(2), 169-186.
• Nicholls, J., Lawlor, E., Neitzert, M., & Goodspeed, N. (2012). A guide to social return on investment. Cabinet Office.
• Olsen, S., & Galimidi, B. (2008). Catalyzing capital for social benefit ● A framework for understanding the universe of investment approaches. JP Morgan Global Philanthropy Centre.
• Salamon, L. M. (2010). Putting the civil society sector to work ● Theory, data, and policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press.
• Weber, J. (2018). Social value creation in hybrid organizations ● A systematic review and configurational analysis. Business & Society, 57(4), 675-715.