Fundamentals

Forty-two percent of automation initiatives Meaning ● Automation Initiatives, in the context of SMB growth, represent structured efforts to implement technologies that reduce manual intervention in business processes. fail, not from technological shortcomings, but from cultural resistance. This figure, often buried beneath the hype of efficiency gains Meaning ● Efficiency Gains, within the context of Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs), represent the quantifiable improvements in operational productivity and resource utilization realized through strategic initiatives such as automation and process optimization. and cost reductions, whispers a crucial truth to small and medium-sized businesses (SMBs) ● measuring automation culture implementation Meaning ● Culture implementation in SMBs is about shaping a values-driven ecosystem for organic growth and employee empowerment. success demands a perspective shift. It’s not simply about tracking lines of code deployed or tasks automated; it’s about understanding the human ecosystem within which these technologies operate.

For SMBs, where resources are often stretched thin and every employee’s contribution feels magnified, this cultural dimension becomes paramount. Ignoring it is akin to building a high-speed railway on unstable ground ● impressive on the surface, fundamentally flawed beneath.

Defining Automation Culture in the SMB Context

Automation culture, within the specific landscape of SMBs, is the shared mindset and behaviors that embrace automation as a positive force for growth and improvement, not a threat. This is a significant departure from the often-cited fear of job displacement. In smaller organizations, the lines between roles are frequently blurred, and employees often wear multiple hats. Introducing automation here can be perceived as a direct challenge to individual value and job security, unlike in larger corporations where roles are more compartmentalized.

Therefore, a successful automation culture Meaning ● Automation Culture, within the realm of SMB growth, represents a shared mindset and organizational structure focused on leveraging automation technologies to optimize business processes. in an SMB is one where employees actively seek out opportunities for automation, understand its purpose in enhancing their work, and contribute to its effective implementation. It’s about fostering an environment where automation is seen as a tool to amplify human capabilities, not replace them.

Why Traditional Metrics Fall Short

Traditional metrics like ROI, cost savings, and efficiency gains are undeniably important for any business, including SMBs venturing into automation. These numbers provide tangible evidence of the financial impact of automation projects. However, they offer an incomplete picture of automation culture implementation success. Consider a scenario where an SMB implements a new CRM system with automated sales workflows.

Initial metrics might show a 20% increase in sales efficiency. On the surface, this looks like a success. Yet, if the sales team is resistant to using the new system, finds it cumbersome, or feels their expertise is being undervalued by automated processes, the long-term sustainability of this “success” is questionable. Burnout, decreased morale, and even quiet quitting can erode initial gains, proving that focusing solely on quantitative metrics is a recipe for a potentially hollow victory. True success lies in embedding automation into the very fabric of the SMB’s operational DNA, and that requires measuring the less tangible, yet equally critical, cultural aspects.

The Human-Centric Measurement Approach

To truly gauge automation culture implementation success, SMBs must adopt a human-centric measurement approach. This means moving beyond spreadsheets and dashboards to engage directly with employees, understand their perceptions, and observe behavioral shifts. It’s about listening to the often-unspoken anxieties and aspirations that automation brings to the forefront. This approach isn’t about discarding traditional metrics, but rather contextualizing them within a broader understanding of the human impact.

Think of it as conducting an orchestra; you can measure the volume and tempo of the music, but to understand the performance, you must also observe the musicians, their engagement, and the overall harmony they create. For SMBs, this means developing methods to capture qualitative data Meaning ● Qualitative Data, within the realm of Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs), is descriptive information that captures characteristics and insights not easily quantified, frequently used to understand customer behavior, market sentiment, and operational efficiencies. alongside quantitative data, creating a holistic view of automation culture implementation success.

Measuring automation culture implementation success Meaning ● Implementation Success, within the context of Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs), denotes the degree to which a strategic plan, software, or automated system is integrated and achieves its intended operational or growth objectives. in SMBs demands a shift from solely focusing on quantitative metrics to incorporating human-centric qualitative data, understanding employee perceptions, and observing behavioral changes.

Practical First Steps for SMBs

For SMBs just beginning their automation journey, measuring culture implementation success can seem daunting. Where do you even start? The initial steps should be practical, low-cost, and focused on gathering baseline data. This isn’t about implementing complex surveys or hiring expensive consultants.

It’s about leveraging existing communication channels and creating new, informal feedback loops. Think of it as taking the temperature of the organization, not performing open-heart surgery. These initial steps lay the groundwork for a more robust measurement framework as automation initiatives expand.

Informal Feedback Sessions

One of the simplest and most effective methods is to conduct informal feedback sessions with employees. These aren’t formal surveys or structured interviews, but rather open conversations facilitated by team leaders or managers. The goal is to create a safe space for employees to express their thoughts and feelings about automation. Questions should be open-ended and exploratory, such as “How do you see automation impacting your role?” or “What are your initial thoughts about the new automated system?”.

These sessions provide valuable qualitative data, revealing underlying anxieties, misconceptions, and even enthusiasm that might not surface through traditional channels. The key is to listen actively, without judgment, and to demonstrate that employee feedback Meaning ● Employee feedback is the systematic process of gathering and utilizing employee input to improve business operations and employee experience within SMBs. is valued and will be considered in the automation implementation Meaning ● Strategic integration of tech to boost SMB efficiency, growth, and competitiveness. process.

Observational Analysis

Another practical first step is observational analysis. This involves simply observing how employees interact with new automation tools Meaning ● Automation Tools, within the sphere of SMB growth, represent software solutions and digital instruments designed to streamline and automate repetitive business tasks, minimizing manual intervention. and processes in their daily work. Are they readily adopting the new systems, or are they reverting to old, manual methods? Are they seeking help and training, or are they struggling in silence?

Are they collaborating and sharing best practices, or is there a sense of isolation and frustration? These observations, documented systematically, can provide valuable insights into the practical challenges employees are facing and the level of cultural acceptance of automation. It’s about becoming a business anthropologist, observing the organizational tribe and its evolving relationship with technology.

Baseline Employee Surveys (Simple & Focused)

While informal feedback and observation are crucial, a simple baseline employee survey can provide a more structured starting point. This survey should be short, focused, and avoid overly complex or jargon-laden questions. The goal is to capture a snapshot of employee sentiment Meaning ● Employee Sentiment, within the context of Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs), reflects the aggregate attitude, perception, and emotional state of employees regarding their work experience, their leadership, and the overall business environment. towards automation at the outset of the implementation process. Questions might include ● “How comfortable are you with using new technologies in your work?”, “Do you believe automation can improve your job?”, and “Do you feel you have enough information about upcoming automation changes?”.

The survey should be anonymous to encourage honest feedback and should be repeated periodically to track changes in employee sentiment over time. This baseline survey acts as a compass, providing direction for cultural interventions and adjustments.

By taking these practical first steps, SMBs can begin to measure automation culture implementation success from a human-centric perspective. These methods, while simple, provide a rich understanding of the organizational culture Meaning ● Organizational culture is the shared personality of an SMB, shaping behavior and impacting success. and its response to automation. They move beyond the limitations of purely quantitative metrics, offering a more nuanced and ultimately more valuable assessment of true automation success.

Intermediate

Beyond the initial forays into measuring automation culture, SMBs must refine their approach to develop a more sophisticated and data-driven understanding of implementation success. Simply gauging initial reactions is insufficient for long-term strategic alignment. As automation becomes more deeply integrated into SMB operations, the measurement framework needs to evolve, incorporating both quantitative and qualitative metrics into a cohesive system. This intermediate stage demands a more structured approach, moving from anecdotal evidence to verifiable insights that can inform strategic decision-making and drive continuous improvement.

Developing Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for Automation Culture

To move beyond subjective assessments, SMBs should develop specific Key Performance Indicators Meaning ● Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) represent measurable values that demonstrate how effectively a small or medium-sized business (SMB) is achieving key business objectives. (KPIs) that directly reflect automation culture implementation success. These KPIs should be measurable, relevant to the SMB’s specific context, and trackable over time. They should encompass both quantitative and qualitative dimensions, providing a balanced view of progress.

The selection of appropriate KPIs is not a one-size-fits-all exercise; it requires careful consideration of the SMB’s industry, size, organizational structure, and specific automation goals. It’s about crafting a measurement blueprint that is tailored to the unique contours of the SMB.

Quantitative KPIs ● Efficiency and Adoption

While cultural metrics are paramount, quantitative KPIs remain essential for demonstrating the tangible benefits of automation and its integration into the SMB’s operational fabric. These KPIs typically focus on efficiency gains and the rate of automation adoption Meaning ● SMB Automation Adoption: Strategic tech integration to boost efficiency, innovation, & ethical growth. across different departments or processes. Examples include:

1. Automation Adoption Rate ● The percentage of eligible processes or tasks that have been successfully automated. This KPI tracks the breadth of automation implementation and its penetration across the organization.
2. Process Efficiency Improvement ● Measured by metrics such as reduced processing time, decreased error rates, or increased output per employee in automated processes compared to pre-automation levels. This directly quantifies the operational benefits of automation.
3. Cost Savings from Automation ● Calculated by comparing operational costs before and after automation implementation, taking into account factors such as reduced labor costs, decreased waste, and optimized resource utilization. This KPI demonstrates the financial ROI of automation investments.
4. System Utilization Rates ● For specific automation tools or platforms, tracking utilization rates (e.g., percentage of employees actively using a new CRM system or automation software) provides insights into the practical adoption and engagement with automation technologies.

These quantitative KPIs provide concrete data points that demonstrate the operational and financial impact of automation. However, they must be interpreted in conjunction with qualitative data to understand the underlying cultural dynamics Meaning ● Cultural dynamics, within the SMB landscape, represent the evolving values, beliefs, and behaviors that influence how a small or medium-sized business operates, adapts to change, and interacts with its stakeholders. driving these numbers.

Qualitative KPIs ● Engagement and Sentiment

Qualitative KPIs delve into the human dimension of automation culture, capturing employee engagement, sentiment, and behavioral shifts. These metrics are crucial for understanding the depth of cultural integration and identifying potential areas of resistance or friction. Examples include:

• Employee Automation Engagement Score ● Developed through surveys or feedback sessions, this score measures the level of employee interest, participation, and proactive involvement in automation initiatives. It reflects the degree to which employees are embracing automation as a shared organizational goal.
• Automation Skills Development Rate ● Tracking the number of employees participating in automation-related training programs, workshops, or skill-building initiatives. This KPI indicates the organization’s commitment to upskilling its workforce and fostering a culture of continuous learning in the context of automation.
• Employee Feedback Sentiment Analysis ● Analyzing employee feedback from surveys, feedback sessions, and internal communication channels to gauge the overall sentiment towards automation. Sentiment analysis can identify positive trends, areas of concern, and emerging cultural narratives surrounding automation.
• Cross-Functional Automation Collaboration Metrics ● Measuring the level of collaboration and knowledge sharing between different departments or teams on automation projects. This KPI reflects the breakdown of silos and the emergence of a more integrated and collaborative automation culture.

These qualitative KPIs provide a richer understanding of the human experience of automation within the SMB. They capture the nuances of cultural change and provide valuable insights for fostering a more positive and productive automation culture.

Data Collection Methods ● Beyond Surveys

While surveys remain a valuable tool, the intermediate stage of measuring automation culture implementation success requires diversifying data collection methods to gain a more comprehensive and nuanced understanding. Relying solely on surveys can lead to survey fatigue and may not capture the full spectrum of employee experiences and behaviors. SMBs should explore a range of qualitative and quantitative data collection techniques to triangulate insights and build a more robust measurement framework.

Pulse Checks and Micro-Surveys

To overcome survey fatigue and gather more frequent feedback, SMBs can implement pulse checks and micro-surveys. Pulse checks are short, frequent surveys (e.g., weekly or bi-weekly) with just a few targeted questions focused on specific aspects of automation culture. Micro-surveys are even shorter, often consisting of just one or two questions delivered through instant messaging or email.

These methods provide real-time insights into employee sentiment and can quickly identify emerging issues or areas requiring attention. They are akin to taking regular vital signs of the organization’s cultural health.

Focus Groups and In-Depth Interviews

For deeper qualitative insights, focus groups and in-depth interviews are invaluable. Focus groups bring together small groups of employees from different departments or roles to discuss their experiences with automation in a facilitated setting. In-depth interviews involve one-on-one conversations with individual employees to explore their perspectives in greater detail.

These methods allow for richer, more nuanced data collection, uncovering underlying motivations, anxieties, and cultural narratives that surveys may miss. They are like ethnographic studies within the SMB, revealing the intricate details of the organizational culture.

Automation System Usage Analytics

Beyond employee-centric data collection, analyzing usage data from automation systems themselves can provide valuable insights into adoption patterns and potential challenges. Tracking metrics such as frequency of system logins, feature utilization, error rates, and help desk requests can reveal areas where employees are struggling or underutilizing automation tools. This data can inform targeted training initiatives, system improvements, and communication strategies to enhance automation adoption and cultural integration. It’s like listening to the digital heartbeat of the automation systems, revealing patterns of usage and areas for optimization.

By diversifying data collection methods, SMBs can move beyond a purely survey-based approach to measuring automation culture implementation success. This multi-faceted approach provides a more holistic and reliable understanding of the cultural dynamics at play, enabling more informed decision-making and targeted interventions.

Developing a robust measurement framework for automation culture in SMBs involves a balanced approach, combining quantitative KPIs focused on efficiency and adoption with qualitative KPIs that capture employee engagement Meaning ● Employee Engagement in SMBs is the strategic commitment of employees' energies towards business goals, fostering growth and competitive advantage. and sentiment.

Benchmarking and Industry Comparisons

To gain further context and perspective, SMBs should consider benchmarking their automation culture implementation success against industry peers and best-in-class organizations. Benchmarking provides valuable insights into industry standards, best practices, and potential areas for improvement. It helps SMBs understand where they stand relative to their competitors and identify aspirational targets for cultural development. This comparative perspective can be particularly valuable for SMBs that are new to automation and seeking guidance on effective implementation strategies.

Industry-Specific Benchmarks

Focusing on industry-specific benchmarks is crucial for SMBs, as automation culture dynamics can vary significantly across different sectors. For example, an SMB in the manufacturing sector might benchmark against other manufacturers in terms of automation adoption rates Meaning ● Automation Adoption Rates, in the context of Small and Medium-sized Businesses (SMBs), represent the percentage of SMBs within a specific market or industry that have implemented automation technologies to streamline operations, enhance productivity, and drive growth. in production processes, while a service-based SMB might focus on customer service automation and employee satisfaction with automated customer interactions. Industry associations, research reports, and industry publications often provide valuable data and insights for benchmarking automation initiatives within specific sectors. It’s about comparing apples to apples, ensuring relevant and meaningful benchmarks.

Best-In-Class Automation Culture Examples

Beyond industry-specific benchmarks, studying best-in-class examples of automation culture can provide inspiration and practical guidance. Identifying organizations, regardless of industry, that are recognized for their positive and productive automation cultures can offer valuable lessons. Case studies, industry awards, and thought leadership articles often highlight organizations that have successfully fostered a culture of automation acceptance, innovation, and employee empowerment.

Analyzing their strategies, measurement frameworks, and cultural initiatives can provide actionable insights for SMBs seeking to emulate their success. It’s about learning from the pioneers and adapting their best practices to the SMB context.

Internal Benchmarking Across Departments

Within the SMB itself, internal benchmarking across different departments or teams can also be valuable. Comparing automation culture implementation success across different parts of the organization can identify pockets of excellence, areas of resistance, and best practices that can be shared internally. For example, if one department has achieved high automation adoption rates and positive employee sentiment, while another department is lagging behind, analyzing the differences in their implementation approaches and cultural dynamics can reveal valuable insights for improving overall automation culture across the SMB. It’s about leveraging internal knowledge and fostering a culture of shared learning and improvement.

By incorporating benchmarking and industry comparisons into their measurement framework, SMBs can gain a broader perspective on their automation culture implementation success. This comparative approach provides valuable context, identifies areas for improvement, and helps SMBs set ambitious yet realistic goals for cultural development in the age of automation.

Advanced

For SMBs that have progressed beyond initial implementation and intermediate measurement, the advanced stage of automation culture development necessitates a more strategic, systemic, and future-oriented approach. It’s no longer sufficient to simply track adoption rates or employee sentiment; the focus shifts to embedding automation culture as a core organizational competency, driving continuous innovation, and building long-term resilience in a rapidly evolving technological landscape. This advanced phase demands a sophisticated understanding of complex systems, organizational dynamics, and the ethical implications of automation, moving beyond tactical metrics to strategic cultural transformation.

Systemic Measurement ● Interconnectedness and Feedback Loops

Advanced measurement of automation culture implementation success requires a systemic perspective, recognizing the interconnectedness of various organizational elements and the importance of feedback loops. Automation culture is not an isolated phenomenon; it is deeply intertwined with other aspects of organizational culture, such as innovation culture, learning culture, and leadership culture. Measuring success in isolation is akin to assessing the health of an organ without considering its role within the entire body.

A systemic approach examines the interplay between automation culture and other organizational subsystems, understanding how they influence and reinforce each other. It’s about mapping the complex web of relationships that define the organizational ecosystem.

Integrated KPI Dashboards

To facilitate a systemic view, SMBs should develop integrated KPI dashboards that bring together quantitative and qualitative metrics from various organizational domains. These dashboards should not only track automation-specific KPIs but also incorporate metrics related to innovation, employee engagement, customer satisfaction, and overall business performance. By visualizing these interconnected data points in a unified dashboard, SMB leaders can gain a holistic understanding of how automation culture is impacting the broader organizational system. The dashboard becomes a cockpit, providing a comprehensive view of the organization’s cultural landscape.

Real-Time Feedback Mechanisms

In the advanced stage, feedback mechanisms need to move beyond periodic surveys and become more real-time and continuous. Integrating feedback loops Meaning ● Feedback loops are cyclical processes where business outputs become inputs, shaping future actions for SMB growth and adaptation. directly into automation systems and workflows allows for immediate capture of employee experiences and identification of potential issues. For example, automation platforms can incorporate feedback prompts at key points in a process, soliciting immediate input from users. Sentiment analysis tools can be integrated into internal communication channels to continuously monitor employee sentiment towards automation.

These real-time feedback mechanisms create a dynamic and responsive measurement system, enabling proactive adjustments and interventions. It’s about creating a living, breathing measurement organism that constantly adapts to the evolving cultural landscape.

Causal Loop Diagramming

To understand the complex causal relationships between different organizational factors and automation culture, SMBs can utilize causal loop diagramming. This systems thinking technique visually maps out the feedback loops and interdependencies between variables, such as automation adoption, employee skills, leadership support, and innovation capacity. By creating causal loop diagrams, SMB leaders can gain a deeper understanding of the underlying dynamics driving automation culture and identify leverage points for strategic intervention. These diagrams become strategic maps, guiding cultural transformation efforts with a systems-informed perspective.

By adopting a systemic measurement approach, SMBs can move beyond linear cause-and-effect thinking and embrace the complexity of organizational dynamics. This advanced perspective enables a more nuanced and effective measurement of automation culture implementation success, driving holistic organizational improvement.

Advanced measurement of automation culture success in SMBs requires a systemic perspective, utilizing integrated KPI dashboards, real-time feedback mechanisms, and causal loop diagramming to understand interconnectedness and feedback loops.

Leading Indicators and Predictive Analytics

The advanced stage of measurement also involves shifting from lagging indicators, which reflect past performance, to leading indicators that predict future outcomes. Lagging indicators, such as cost savings or efficiency gains, are valuable for demonstrating the historical impact of automation. However, they provide limited insight into the future trajectory of automation culture and its potential to drive sustained innovation and resilience.

Leading indicators, on the other hand, anticipate future trends and potential challenges, enabling proactive interventions and strategic adjustments. Predictive analytics Meaning ● Strategic foresight through data for SMB success. further enhances this future-oriented approach, leveraging data to forecast potential cultural shifts and proactively shape the desired automation culture.

Employee Skill Adaptability Index

A crucial leading indicator for automation culture success is employee skill adaptability. Developing an “Employee Skill Adaptability Index” can measure the organization’s capacity to continuously upskill and reskill its workforce in response to evolving automation technologies. This index could incorporate metrics such as employee participation in future-skills training programs, certifications in automation-related technologies, internal mobility rates into automation-focused roles, and employee self-assessments of their adaptability mindset.

A high skill adaptability index indicates a proactive and future-oriented automation culture, capable of embracing continuous change and innovation. It’s a barometer of the organization’s future-readiness in the age of automation.

Innovation Pipeline for Automation

Another leading indicator is the strength and dynamism of the “Innovation Pipeline for Automation.” This metric assesses the organization’s capacity to generate, evaluate, and implement new automation ideas and initiatives. It could track metrics such as the number of employee-generated automation ideas, the success rate of pilot automation projects, the time to market for new automation solutions, and the level of investment in automation R&D. A robust innovation pipeline Meaning ● An Innovation Pipeline, in the context of SMB (Small and Medium-sized Businesses) growth, automation, and implementation, represents the structured series of stages a business idea progresses through, from initial conception to successful market adoption. indicates a thriving automation culture that is not only adopting existing technologies but also actively shaping the future of automation within the SMB. It’s a measure of the organization’s proactive role in the automation ecosystem.

Cultural Resilience Score

In an increasingly volatile and uncertain business environment, cultural resilience becomes a critical success factor for automation implementation. Developing a “Cultural Resilience Score” can measure the organization’s ability to adapt and bounce back from disruptions, challenges, and unexpected consequences related to automation. This score could incorporate metrics such as employee morale during periods of technological change, the speed of recovery from automation-related failures, the effectiveness of crisis communication related to automation issues, and the organization’s capacity to learn from automation setbacks.

A high cultural resilience score indicates an automation culture that is not only efficient and innovative but also robust and sustainable in the face of adversity. It’s a measure of the organization’s long-term viability in the automation era.

By incorporating leading indicators and predictive analytics into their measurement framework, SMBs can move beyond reactive measurement and adopt a proactive, future-oriented approach to automation culture development. This advanced perspective enables strategic foresight and proactive interventions, ensuring long-term success in the age of automation.

Ethical Considerations and Responsible Automation

The advanced stage of automation culture implementation success cannot ignore the ethical dimensions of automation and the imperative for responsible automation Meaning ● Responsible Automation for SMBs means ethically deploying tech to boost growth, considering stakeholder impact and long-term values. practices. As SMBs increasingly leverage automation technologies, they must proactively address the ethical implications of their automation choices, ensuring fairness, transparency, and accountability. Measuring success in this context extends beyond efficiency and innovation to encompass ethical considerations and the social impact Meaning ● Social impact, within the SMB sphere, represents the measurable effect a company's actions have on society and the environment. of automation. It’s about building an automation culture that is not only technologically advanced but also ethically grounded and socially responsible.

Bias Audits in Automated Systems

One crucial ethical consideration is the potential for bias in automated systems, particularly in areas such as hiring, performance evaluation, and customer service. SMBs should implement regular “Bias Audits” of their automated systems to identify and mitigate potential biases that could lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. These audits should examine the data used to train automation algorithms, the design of automated decision-making processes, and the impact of automation on different employee and customer groups.

Proactive bias audits ensure that automation systems are fair, equitable, and aligned with ethical principles. It’s about building ethical guardrails into the automation infrastructure.

Transparency and Explainability Metrics

Transparency and explainability are essential for building trust and acceptance of automation, particularly in areas where automated decisions impact individuals. SMBs should develop “Transparency and Explainability Metrics” to measure the degree to which their automated systems are transparent and understandable to employees and customers. These metrics could assess the clarity of communication about automation processes, the availability of explanations for automated decisions, and the accessibility of human oversight and intervention in automated workflows.

Increased transparency and explainability foster trust, reduce anxiety, and promote ethical automation practices. It’s about opening the black box of automation and making it understandable and accountable.

Social Impact Assessments of Automation

Beyond internal ethical considerations, SMBs should also consider the broader social impact of their automation initiatives. Conducting “Social Impact Assessments of Automation” can evaluate the potential consequences of automation on the workforce, the community, and society as a whole. These assessments should consider factors such as job displacement, skill gaps, economic inequality, and the environmental impact of automation technologies.

Proactive social impact assessments enable SMBs to make informed decisions about automation implementation, mitigating potential negative consequences and maximizing the positive societal benefits of automation. It’s about extending the measurement of success beyond the organizational boundaries to encompass broader societal responsibilities.

By integrating ethical considerations and responsible automation practices Meaning ● Responsible Automation Practices, within the scope of SMB growth, center on the ethical and efficient deployment of automated systems. into their measurement framework, SMBs can build an automation culture that is not only advanced and efficient but also ethical, sustainable, and socially responsible. This advanced perspective ensures that automation serves humanity, not the other way around.

References

• Brynjolfsson, Erik, and Andrew McAfee. Race Against the Machine ● How the Digital Revolution is Accelerating Innovation, Driving Productivity, and Irreversibly Transforming Employment and the Economy. Digital Frontier Press, 2011.
• Davenport, Thomas H., and Julia Kirby. Only Humans Need Apply ● Winners and Losers in the Age of Smart Machines. Harper Business, 2016.
• Manyika, James, et al. “A Future That Works ● Automation, Employment, and Productivity.” McKinsey Global Institute, January 2017.
• Parasuraman, Raja, and Victor Riley. “Humans and Automation ● Use, Misuse, Disuse, Abuse.” Human Factors, vol. 39, no. 2, 1997, pp. 230-53.
• West, Darrell M. The Future of Work ● Robots, AI, and Automation. Brookings Institution Press, 2018.